Tuesday, July 19, 2011

The Debate on Unions

Unions are a tricky topic. They have their pros and cons, and quite honestly, I'm not sure what to think about them. I've got a dad who is an executive at the Federal Aviation Agency and who witnesses firsthand the tax-payer waste that comes from unionized employees, and I have a grandmother (dad's mom) who is the President of a large-scale California Teacher's Union. My granny came to visit last week and boy oh boy did those two get into it…

My Dad admits it: unions exist to serve a purpose. They protect workers. Plain and simple. But, in his opinion, they are outdated. He asserts that they were necessary back when they originated in the 1800's to protect railroad workers who might face injuries, but now, not so much. In his job at the FAA, he oversees employees who come to work each and every day and sit in front of a computer doing absolutely nothing. The catch? They can't be fired. It's too difficult to hold public employee union workers accountable. My dad has said, "Just about the only way you can fire a public employee is for sexual harassment of physical assault. Otherwise, they're still in work."



My grandmother, on the other hand, contends that unions are there to protect employees from unfair management practices. As a public school teacher, she understands the realities of the workplace. She says that without unions, principals can choose to fire teachers at will, with little or no reason at all. If a principal, say, doesn't like the fact that a certain teacher takes of work to observe Jewish holidays, that teacher might be fired. Without unions, teachers are essentially helpless. And sadly, principals often seek scape goats to protect their own skin. A soft-spoken, quiet teacher who declines to challenge the principal is a prime target for lower-tier students. A principal may choose to put the lower-performing kids in a class with that teacher, and when that teacher is shown to have a class full of under-performing children, she's fired. That is, what my granny explain, what teachers' "tenure" is for. She says, at least in her school district, principals can fire a teacher at any time in the first two years of their employment if they so choose. After that, teachers are tenured and protected. But, is the protection necessary? Do unions really serve a purpose? Do they do more harm than good?

In her old-age and wisdom, my grandmother admitted that both sides have extremes. Sometimes, incompetent teachers are protected by unions when they shouldn't be. By the same token, teachers are often fired unfairly. "Unions aren't perfect," she acceptingly conceded, "but they are a barrier to attempt to aid the lowly-paid public employees of the country".

What do YOU think?

17 comments:

  1. i work at walmart, had to hear a crazy anti-union argument. walmart is insanely anti union its sad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that unions belong in most places, perhaps not all, but there is definitely still a place for them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Indiehastag - From what I understand, one of the reasons Walmart is the wealthiest corporation in the world @ $400B is because they don't have to waste extra money fighting labor costs with unions.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "In his job at the FAA, he oversees employees who come to work each and every day and sit in front of a computer doing absolutely nothing"

    Here in spain we have a big problem with that, the money from the taxes just disapear in salaries of people who do nothing at all, but the country cannot fire them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Any chance of a union is abolished if you work in a chain retail store sadly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. the wise truth is told by the elderly ^^
    +1

    ReplyDelete
  7. As a person living in Wisconsin, it sure seems like a lot of people hate Walker, but I suppose that's to be expected when you live in a community where all there are is teachers living around me. (Eau Claire)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well.. hard to disagree with your grandmother:)

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm with your grandmother on this one. Maybe she should give your dad a talking to :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I have a friend that used to work at the county jail and the guards and deputies are part of a union. from what I was told they used to do about half an hour's worth of work in the entire day

    ReplyDelete
  11. your granny's right bro. they are there to protect the workers from being outsmarted by the corps.

    ReplyDelete
  12. this is relevant to my interest. +1 follower

    ReplyDelete
  13. Same as above. The unions are both good and bad, so I think I'm gonna stay neutral this time.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I like the representation on that picture.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I dont know enough to argue either way but from what i've heard unions are out of date. most of the things i think unions enforced back in the day are now federal laws

    ReplyDelete
  16. Unions are important, the problem is some of them have become as greedy as their employers.

    ReplyDelete